Krav Maga and Filipino Martial Arts are both respected systems with practical roots, but they are built around different training priorities. Understanding those differences can help people choose an approach that fits what they’re looking for.
Filipino Martial Arts is a broad term that includes systems such as Kali, Eskrima, and Arnis. These systems are known for their emphasis on weapons training, coordination, and adaptability. Training often involves sticks, blades, and empty-hand techniques, with a strong focus on timing, flow, and technical skill.
Many people are drawn to Filipino Martial Arts because of their depth, cultural heritage, and emphasis on developing coordination and precision. Training can involve learning structured drills as well as exploring how techniques translate across different tools and situations.
Krav Maga takes a different approach. It is designed specifically as a self-defence system, with training focused on dealing with common real-world threats. Rather than specialising in particular weapons or traditional drills, Krav Maga emphasises awareness, decision-making, and simple responses under stress.
Training in Krav Maga is structured around personal safety rather than technical mastery or tradition. Techniques are chosen for their practicality and are taught in a way that prioritises clarity, adaptability, and ease of recall in high-pressure situations.
Another difference lies in how progress is experienced. Filipino Martial Arts often suit people who enjoy developing fine motor skills, coordination, and exploring a system in depth over time. Krav Maga often suits people who are looking for a more direct self-defence focus, without the need to study a wide range of traditional material.
Some people train in both and find value in each for different reasons. Others prefer one approach depending on whether their priority is technical development, cultural practice, or practical self-defence.
Neither system is inherently better than the other. They are designed for different purposes and suit different types of learners. Understanding what each approach emphasises can make it easier to choose the training style that feels most appropriate.
Different training approaches suit different people. Taking the time to understand those differences helps ensure that the choice is based on personal goals rather than assumptions.
For those exploring self-defence training in Auckland, understanding these differences can help narrow down which approach feels most appropriate.
Krav Maga, which means "contact combat" in Hebrew, was developed in the 1930s and 1940s by Imi Lichtenfeld, a Hungarian-Israeli martial artist. It was originally created for the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) to provide soldiers with a practical and efficient system for hand-to-hand combat. Over time, Krav Maga evolved into a civilian self-defense system, emphasizing real-world applicability and survival in life-threatening situations (we teach civilian self defence at Krav Maga Global).
The philosophy is rooted in simplicity, adaptability, and aggression. It is not a traditional martial art but rather a modern combat system designed to neutralize threats as quickly as possible. Its techniques are derived from a combination of boxing, wrestling, judo, and street-fighting principles.
Filipino Martial Arts, also known as Kali, Eskrima, or Arnis, were developed by the indigenous peoples of the Philippines as a means of self-defence and warfare. FMA was heavily influenced by the country's history of colonisation, trade, and cultural exchange, incorporating elements from Malay, Indonesian, Chinese, and Spanish martial traditions.
FMA is unique in its emphasis on weapon-based training, particularly with sticks, knives, and bladed weapons. However, it also includes empty-hand techniques, grappling, and striking. The philosophy of FMA revolves around adaptability, fluidity, and the concept of "flow," where practitioners learn to transition seamlessly between weapons and empty-hand combat.
Krav Maga Self Defence | Filipino Martial Arts (FMA) | |
|---|---|---|
Origins |
|
|
Focus |
|
|
Philosophy & Mindset |
|
|
Attire & Safety Gear |
|
|
Techniques & Movements |
|
|
Efficiency |
|
|
Training Style |
|
|
Self Defence Techniques |
|
|
Weapons Training |
|
|
Both are highly effective systems with unique strengths.
Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on your personal goals, interests, and training preferences. Regardless of which path you choose, both arts offer valuable skills and insights for self-defense and personal development.